BibTeX
@InProceedings{mahlow2007a,
author = {Hess, Michael and Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Sentence Completion Tests in a Virtual Laboratory}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the German e-Science Conference},
year = {2007},
month = may,
organization = {Helmholtz Gesellschaft, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Hochschulrektorenkonferenz},
abstract = {{This Paper describes a type of on-line test, the Sentence Completion
Test (SCT), that tries to fill the gap between rigid Multiple Choice
tests and unreliable automatic essay grading approaches. We give
a short overview of the main concepts, the implementation and show
examplary uses and applications. SCTs are used as one component in
a fully operational virtual laboratory of Computational Linguistics
in use at the University of Zurich.}},
citeulike-article-id = {2635454},
journal = {German e-Science Conference 2007},
keywords = {clab, elearning, mahlow, set},
posted-at = {2008-04-06 21:52:05},
priority = {0},
url = {http://vg00.met.vgwort.de/na/90a3d9f649f3f19d807b?l=http://edoc.mpg.de/get.epl}
@incollection{mahlow2013c,
author = {Juska-Bacher, Britta and Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Phraseological Change--a Book with Seven Seals? Tracing the Diachronic
Development of German Proverbs and Idioms by a combination of Corpus
and Dictionary Analyses}},
booktitle = {New Methods in Historical Corpora},
publisher = {Narr Francke Attempto},
year = {2013},
editor = {Bennet, Paul and Durrell, Martin and Scheible, Silke and Whitt, Richard
J.},
volume = {3},
series = {Corpus linguistics and Interdisciplinary perspectives on language},
pages = {139-150},
address = {T{ü}bingen, Germany},
month = oct,
abstract = {{Dictionaries and collections of proverbs, idioms, or phrasemes usually
provide synchronic information with only little evidence of actual
use. While various extensive dictionaries and collections are available
for German, a comprehensive description of structural and semantic
change of phrasemes over time is still lacking. Our article highlights
some issues and challenges, and presents a semi-automatic corpus-based
approach for the diachronic investigation of phraseme development.
We argue for a combination of dictionary exploration and corpus-based
methods, to provide reliable information about the diachronic development
of German phrasemes}},
citeulike-article-id = {12734708},
isbn = {978-3-8233-6760-4},
keywords = {corpus, dictionary, german, nlp, oldphras, phrasemes},
posted-at = {2013-10-24 14:10:05},
priority = {0}
}
@incollection{mahlow2013b,
author = {Juska-Bacher, Britta and Mahlow, Cerstin and Quassdorf, Sixta},
title = {{Vergleich nominaler phraseologischer Komponenten im Deutschen und
Spanischen mit computerlinguistischen Werkzeugen}},
booktitle = {La fraseologia del alem{á}n y espa{ñ}ol: lexicograf{i}a y
traducci{ó}n},
publisher = {peniope},
year = {2013},
editor = {Mellado, Carmen and Buj{á}n, Patricia and Iglesias, Nely and Losada,
Mª C. and Mansilla, Ana},
pages = {143-156},
address = {M{ü}nchen},
abstract = {{Manuelle Vergleiche phraseologischer Systeme existieren bereits f{ü}r
verschiedene Sprachen. In diesem Artikel pr{ä}sentieren wir einen
Vergleich nominaler Phrasemkomponenten des Deutschen und Spanischen,
gest{ü}tzt auf aktuelle Lexika und computerlinguistische Werkzeuge.
Wir vergleichen die Top-50-Nomen in beiden Sprachen, bestimmen Nomen,
die nur im Spanischen, aber nicht im Deutschen aktiv sind, und kontrastieren
die phraseologische Aktivit{ä}t von Nomen beider Sprachen. Abschlie{ß}end
zeigen wir weitere M{ö}glichkeiten und Grenzen des Einsatzes computerlinguistischer
Werkzeuge f{ü}r phraseologische Systemvergleiche.}},
citeulike-article-id = {12599865},
keywords = {german, multiword, oldphras, phrasemes, smm, spanish},
posted-at = {2013-08-28 12:31:00},
priority = {0}
}
@mastersthesis{mahlow2000,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Automatische Wortformanalyse f{ü}r das Spanische}},
school = {Abteilung Computerlinguistik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universit{ä}t
Erlangen-N{ü}rnberg},
year = {2000},
citeulike-article-id = {620451},
keywords = {malaga, morphology, nlp, spanish},
pages = {151},
posted-at = {2006-05-09 13:21:12},
priority = {0},
url = {http://www.linguistik.uni-erlangen.de/~cnmahlow/maggi.online.pdf}
}
@article{mahlow2008c,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Dieser Satz kein Verb}},
journal = {readme. Das Bulletin der Alumni Wirtschaftsinformatik Universit{ä}t
Z{ü}rich},
year = {2008},
volume = {20},
pages = {11},
month = sep,
citeulike-article-id = {3393069},
keywords = {lingured, mahlow, word-processing, writing},
posted-at = {2008-10-10 13:09:02},
priority = {0}
}
@article{mahlow2009h,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Ein Blended-Learning-Szenario mit OLAT}},
journal = {HAMBURGER eLEARNING MAGAZIN},
year = {2009},
volume = {3},
pages = {20-21},
month = dec,
abstract = {{Seit sechs Jahren werden die Kurse zur Einf{ü}hrung in die "Programmierung
mit Perl f{ü}r Computerlinguisten" an der Universit{ä}t Z{ü}rich
mit OLAT-Kursen begleitet. Das grundlegende didaktische Szenario
ist vergleichbar mit Methodenkursen oder Einf{ü}hrungskursen anderer
F{ä}cher: Jede Woche finden 2 Stunden Vorlesung statt, die Studierendenerhalten
{Ü}bungsaufgaben, die selbstst{ä}ndigbis zur n{ä}chsten Woche
zu l{ö}sen sind. Der Leistungsnachweis ist eine Klausur am Computer,
bei der die Studierenden unter Aufsicht Programmieraufgaben l{ö}sen
und Fragen beantworten.}},
citeulike-article-id = {6562158},
keywords = {blended-learning, elearning, mahlow, perl},
organization = {University of Hamburg},
posted-at = {2010-01-19 11:27:35},
priority = {0}
}
@incollection{mahlow2010a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Choosing the Appropriate E-Learning System for a University}},
booktitle = {Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for
Online Teaching: Tools and Applications},
publisher = {IGI Global},
year = {2010},
editor = {Kats, Yefim},
chapter = {4},
pages = {57-80},
address = {Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA},
abstract = {{In this chapter the author discuss the introduction of an e-learning
system to enhance teaching and learning at a university. The focus
is on the decision process choosing a system. Abstract criteria and
feature lists are not sufficient for choosing the right e-learning
software, even if all stakeholders and their respective requirements
are heard. The author argues that â softâ factors should be considered
when evaluating e-learning software: (1) The age of the students
and their level of education, (2) the pedagogical guidelines and
the culture of teaching and learning of the university, and (3) the
educational scenarios in lectures and seminars. These factors seem
to be only small details and are typically neither mentioned in the
requirements nor in the feature lists of e-learning software. Therefore
the author proposes that institutions should evaluate prospective
systems in real-world scenarios. As a case in point, the author will
outline a number of significant differences between two e-learning
systems with a focus on pedagogical aspects. The systems can be seen
as representative for a certain class of systems; both offer all
features that are commonly seen as the most relevant when making
a decision for a university e-learning system.}},
citeulike-article-id = {7225568},
isbn = {9781615208531},
keywords = {elearning, mahlow, moodle, olat},
posted-at = {2010-05-28 19:18:26},
priority = {0}
}
@phdthesis{mahlow2011a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Linguistisch unterst{ü}tztes Redigieren: Konzept und exemplarische
Umsetzung basierend auf interaktiven computerlinguistischen Ressourcen}},
school = {University of Zurich},
year = {2011},
abstract = {{Zusammenfassung Schreiben und Redigieren stellen hohe kognitive Anforderungen
an Autoren. Selbst publizierte Texte sind nie ganz fehlerfrei. F{ü}r
viele Fehler kann man die Entstehung rekonstruieren: Funktionen in
Textbearbeitungsprogrammen sind zeichenbasiert und ber{ü}cksichtigen
nicht die Elemente und Strukturen der jeweiligen verwendeten Sprache.
Autoren m{ü}ssen ihre Redigierabsichten in eine lange, komplexe
Folge solcher zeichenbasierten Funktionen {ü}bersetzen. Editoren
f{ü}r Programmierer hingegen bieten seit langem sprachspezifische
Editierfunktionen, die auf den Elementen und Strukturen der verwendeten
Programmiersprache operieren. Diese Funktionen tragen dazu bei, das
{Ä}ndern von Programmcode zu erleichtern und Fehler zu vermeiden.
In dieser Arbeit {ü}bertragen wir das Prinzip solcher sprachspezifischen
Funktionen in Programmiereditoren auf Funktionen f{ü}r die Bearbeitung
nat{ü}rlichsprachlicher Texte. Wir entwickeln das Konzept der linguistisch
unterst{ü}tzten Redigierfunktionen unter Ber{ü}cksichtigung aktueller
Erkenntnisse der Schreibforschung. Wir definieren Informations-,
Bewegungs- und Modifikationsfunktionen, die auf Elementen und Strukturen
nat{ü}rlicher Sprache operieren. Solche Funktionen sollen Autoren
entlasten und helfen, typische Fehler zu vermeiden. Sprachspezifische
Funktionen beruhen auf Methoden zur Erkennung und Bestimmung relevanter
Elemente und Strukturen. Wir verwenden dazu computerlinguistische
Ressourcen zur morphologischen Analyse und Generierung und zur automatischen
Wortartenbestimmung. Die Evaluation verf{ü}gbarer Ressourcen ergibt,
dass die Situation f{ü}r die Behandlung des Deutschen nicht so
vielversprechend ist, wie urspr{ü}nglich angenommen und {ü}blicherweise
in der Literatur dargestellt. Unsere prototypische Implementierung
linguistisch unterst{ü}tzter Redigierfunktionen f{ü}r die Bearbeitung
deutscher Texte zeigt die M{ö}glichkeiten und Grenzen des Konzepts
unter Ber{ü}cksichtigung der Leistungsf{ä}higkeit heute verf{ü}gbarer
computerlinguistischer Ressourcen und der Eigenschaften des Deutschen.
Abstract Composing, revising, and editing are highly demanding tasks.
Even in polished and published texts from professional writers we
can observe errors and mistakes. For many errors, we can infer how
they came to be: Word processors offer character-based functions
only. These functions do not take into account elements and structures
of the language the author is using. Authors are thus forced to translate
their high-level goals into long and complex sequences of low-level
character-based functions. Both the translation process and the execution
of such sequences of functions are error-prone. However, in text
editors for programmers we find so-called language-aware editing
functions. These functions operate on the elements and structures
of a programming or mark-up language and help to avoid errors, as
language-aware functions make revising and editing less tedious and
error-prone. We argue that the concept of language awareness can
be transferred to writing natural language texts using word processors.
We propose functions that take the structures of natural languages
into consideration. We distinguish information functions, movement
functions, and operations to support revising and editing. The design
is based on current findings from writing research. Language-aware
editing functions rely on the recognition and categorization of relevant
elements and structures with respect to a certain language. We use
methods and resources from computational linguistics for morphological
analysis and generation, and for part-of-speech tagging. When evaluating
respective resources we face a rather disappointing situation: NLP
resources for German are less suitable than assumed and less applicable
for real-world applications than usually claimed in the literature.
Our prototypical implementation of language-aware functions for revising
and editing of German texts serves as a proof of concept. The implementation
illustrates opportunities and limits of current NLP resources for
German.}},
citeulike-article-id = {9671635},
key = {mahlow2011a},
keywords = {diss, german, lingured},
posted-at = {2011-08-15 22:01:02},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2012a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {Creating a phraseme matrix based on a {T}ertium {C}omparationis},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress. 7 - 11 August
2012, Oslo},
year = {2012},
editor = {Vatvedt Fjeld, Ruth and Matilde Torjusen, Julie},
pages = {720-725},
abstract = {{Diachronic exploration of linguistic resources like collections and
dictionaries from different time periods allows researchers to get
first impressions on language change and define specific research
questions to investigate further, for example by integrating empirical
data. However, manual inspection of large collections is exhausting
and error prone. Automatic extraction and comparison of the keywords
of dictionary entries from several dictionaries can be used to create
a combined index, allowing to easily access respective dictionary
entries to extract related information. As a case in point we consider
information on German phrasemes in dictionaries and collections from
the 18th to the 21st century. We use a concept-driven semi-automatic
approach to create a matrix based on a Tertium Comparationis to allow
users to easily look up related phrasemes.}},
citeulike-article-id = {11061990},
keywords = {oldphras, phrasemes, semantic_net},
posted-at = {2012-08-14 14:04:59},
priority = {0}
}
@incollection{mahlow2014a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Dale, Robert},
title = {{Production Media: Writing as Using Tools in Media Convergent Environments}},
booktitle = {Handbook of Writing and Text Production},
publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton},
year = {2014},
editor = {Jakobs, Eva-Maria and Perrin, Daniel},
volume = {10},
series = {Handbooks of Applied Linguistics},
pages = {209-230},
address = {Berlin, Germany},
month = feb,
citeulike-article-id = {12017451},
keywords = {review-paper, to_appear, writing-tools, writing_research},
posted-at = {2013-02-13 19:58:10},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2014,
author = {Cerstin Mahlow and Kerstin Eckart and Jens Stegmann and Andre Blessing
and Gregor Thiele and Markus G{ä}rtner and Jonas Kuhn},
title = {{Resources, Tools, and Applications at the CLARIN Center Stuttgart}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 12th Konferenz zur Verarbeitung nat{ü}rlicher
Sprache (KONVENS 2014)}},
year = {2014},
pages = {11-21}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2012b,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Gr{ü}n, Christian and Holupirek, Alexander
and Scholl, Marc H.},
title = {A framework for retrieval and annotation in digital humanities using
{XQuery} full text and update in {BaseX}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering},
year = {2012},
series = {DocEng '12},
pages = {195-204},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
publisher = {ACM},
abstract = {{A key difference between traditional humanities research and the
emerging field of digital humanities is that the latter aims to complement
qualitative methods with quantitative data. In linguistics, this
means the use of large corpora of text, which are usually annotated
automatically using natural language processing tools. However, these
tools do not exist for historical texts, so scholars have to work
with unannotated data. We have developed a system for systematic,
iterative exploration and annotation of historical text corpora,
which relies on an XML database (BaseX) and in particular on the
Full Text and Update facilities of XQuery.}},
citeulike-article-id = {11272037},
doi = {10.1145/2361354.2361398},
isbn = {978-1-4503-1116-8},
keywords = {basex, nlp, oldphras, xml, xquery},
location = {Paris, France},
posted-at = {2012-09-18 16:04:01},
priority = {0},
url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2361354.2361398}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2004,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Hess, Michael},
title = {{Sentence Completion Tests for Training and Assessment in a Computational
Linguistics Curriculum}},
booktitle = {COLING-2004 workshop on eLearning for Computational Linguistics and
Computational Linguistics for eLearning},
year = {2004},
pages = {61-70},
month = aug,
abstract = {{This paper presents a novel type of test, halfway between multiple-choice
and free-form text, used for training and assessment in several courses
in a Computational Linguistics curriculum.We will describe the principles
of the test, the different ways in which it can be used by learners,
and the tools developed for authoring.Use of this type of test is
not limited to the feld of Computational Linguistics. Wherever text
heavy or even picture based topics are taughtuse of this type of
test is possible.}},
citeulike-article-id = {2634996},
keywords = {clab, elearning, set},
posted-at = {2008-04-06 17:26:52},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2007b,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Hess, Michael and Grund, Sven},
title = {{Evolution by Evaluation}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Learning 2007,
Lisbon 6. - 8. Juli 2007},
year = {2007},
editor = {Nunes, Miguel B. and McPherson, Maggie},
volume = {1},
pages = {203-210},
month = jul,
publisher = {IADIS Press},
citeulike-article-id = {2635457},
journal = {Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Learning 2007},
keywords = {clab, elearning, evaluation},
posted-at = {2008-04-06 21:55:34},
priority = {0}
}
@article{mahlow2009a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Hess, Michael and Grund, Sven},
title = {{Evolution by Evaluation}},
journal = {International Journal of Information and Communication Technology
Education},
year = {2009},
volume = {5},
pages = {1-9},
number = {2},
month = apr,
abstract = {{This paper describes the process of formally evaluating an E-Learning
system that has been in use for several years. Professional usability
evaluation offers deeper insight into user behaviour and needs than
accidental feedback collection or introspection by system developers.
A first analysis of the evaluation samples shows satisfaction of
users with the general design of the system but also dissatisfaction
with certain aspects of navigation that would otherwise have escaped
our attention. State of the art formal evaluation turned out to be
instrumental in making an existing system considerably more user-friendly.}},
citeulike-article-id = {3787555},
editor = {Tomei, Lawrence A.},
keywords = {clab, elearning, evaluation},
posted-at = {2008-12-14 14:47:59},
priority = {0}
}
@article{mahlow2011c,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Juska-Bacher, Britta},
title = {Exploring {N}ew {H}igh {G}erman Texts for Evidence of Phrasemes},
journal = {Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics},
year = {2011},
volume = {26},
pages = {117-128},
number = {2},
abstract = {{Most dictionaries containing phraseological information are restricted
to a synchronic perspective. Diachronic information on structural,
semantic, and pragmatic change over time has to be reconstructed
by a time-consuming consultation of various dictionaries providing
only punctual insights. In the OLdPhras, project we construct an
online dictionary for diachronic phraseology in German from ca. 1650
to the present by combining dic- tionary exploration with corpus-based
methods. This paper highlights some challenges we have met: How to
select the â interestingâ phrasemes, i.e., those that underwent
some change? How to deal with historical cor- pora? How to include
different kinds of phraseme variation? We present a semi-automatic
corpus-based approach for the investigation of phraseme development.
We argue for a combination of dictionary exploration and corpus-based
methods to provide reliable and extensive information about the diachronic
development of German phrasemes.}},
citeulike-article-id = {10209322},
editor = {Mambrini, Francesco and Passarotti, Marco and Sporleder, Caroline},
keywords = {corpus, diachronic, german, oldphras},
posted-at = {2012-01-09 14:41:03},
priority = {0}
}
@incollection{mahlow2010d,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and M{ü}ller Fritschi, Elisabeth and Forrer Kasteel,
Esther},
title = {{Bologna als Chance: (E-)Portfolio im Studium der Sozialen Arbeit}},
booktitle = {Digitale Medien f{ü}r Lehre und Forschung},
year = {2010},
editor = {Mandel, Schewa and Rutishauser, Manuel and Seiler Schiedt, Eva},
volume = {55},
series = {Medien in der Wissenschaft},
pages = {144-158},
abstract = {{In diesem Beitrag geben wir eine pragmatische Definition von (E-)Portfolio,
wobei wir auf die Prozesse und das Produkt der Portfolioarbeit fokussieren.
Wir zeigen, wie die durch die Bologna-Reform geforderte Kompetenzorientierung
des Studiums durch den Einsatz von (E- )Portfolio-Szenarien unterst{ü}tzt
werden kann. Portfolios erlauben es, die oft beklagte Tendenz zur
Fragmentierung von Ausbildungswegen aufzufangen und verschaffen den
Studierenden die M{ö}glichkeit, im Studium einen roten Faden zu
erkennen, indem die vermittelten und erarbeiteten Kenntnisse und
F{ä}higkeiten zueinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden. Wir zeigen
die konkrete Umsetzung dieses Konzepts am Beispiel des Studiums der
Sozialen Arbeit an der Hochschule f{ü}r Soziale Arbeit der Fachhochschule
Nordwestschweiz und berichten {ü}ber erste Erfahrungen. Die Besonderheit
des Konzeptes liegt darin, dass das Portfolio-Modul w{ä}hrend der
gesamten Studienzeit belegt wird und so den gesamten Lernprozess
begleitet.}},
citeulike-article-id = {7815213},
isbn = {978-3-8309-2385-5},
keywords = {elearning, portfolio},
posted-at = {2010-09-13 11:13:22},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2008d,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{Computational Linguistics for Word Processing: Opportunities and
Limits}},
booktitle = {Workshop on NLP for Reading and Writing: Resources, Algorithms and
Tools},
year = {2008},
editor = {Sofkova Hashemi, Sylvana and Knutsson, Ola and Domeij, Rickard and
Johansson Kokkinakis, Sofie},
month = nov,
organization = {KTH Royal Institute of Technology},
abstract = {{In this paper we briefly outline editing functions which are aware
of the structures of natural languages by using methods from computational
linguistics. Such functions could reduce errors and better support
writers in realizing their communicative goals. However, linguistic
methods have limits, and there are various aspects software developers
have to take into account to avoid creating a solution looking for
a problem:Language-aware functions could be powerful tools for writers,
but writers must not be forced to adapt to their tools.}},
citeulike-article-id = {3433712},
howpublished = {Online},
keywords = {lingured, word-processing, writing-process, writing-tools},
location = {Stockholm, Sweden},
posted-at = {2008-10-21 14:00:55},
priority = {0},
url = {http://spraakbanken.gu.se/personal/sofie/SLTC_2008/sltc-2008.final.pdf}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2008a,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{Linguistic Support for Revising and Editing}},
booktitle = {Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 9th International
Conference, CICLing 2008, Haifa, Israel, February 17-23, 2008. Proceedings},
year = {2008},
editor = {Gelbukh, Alexander},
volume = {4919},
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
pages = {631-642},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg, New York},
publisher = {Springer},
abstract = {{Revising and editing are important parts of the writing process.
In fact, multiple revision and editing cycles are crucial for the
production of high-quality texts. However, revising and editing are
also tedious and error-prone, since changes may introduce new errors.
Grammar checkers, as offered by some word processors, are not a solution.
Besides the fact that they are only available for few languages,
and regardless of the questionable quality, their conceptual approach
is not suitable for experienced writers, who actively create their
texts. Word processors offer few, if any, functions for handling
text on the same cognitive level as the author: While the author
is thinking in high-level linguistic terms, editors and word processors
mostly provide low-level character oriented functions. Mapping the
intended outcome to these low-level operations is distracting for
the author, who now has to focus for a long time on small parts of
the text. This results in a loss of global overview of the text and
in typical revision errors (duplicate verbs, extraneous conjunctions,
etc.) We therefore propose functions for text processors that work
on the conceptual level of writers. These functions operate on linguistic
elements, not on lines and characters. We describe how these functions
can be implemented by making use of NLP methods and linguistic resources.}},
citeulike-article-id = {2361942},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_54},
journal = {Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing},
keywords = {editing, lingured, revising, word-processing, writing},
posted-at = {2008-02-11 08:52:31},
priority = {0},
url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_54}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2009e,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{LingURed: Language-Aware Editing Functions Based on NLP Resources}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science
and Information Technology},
year = {2009},
volume = {4},
pages = {243-250},
month = oct,
organization = {Polish Information Processing Society},
abstract = {{In this paper we compare the state of the art of language awareness
in source code editors and word processors. Language awareness refers
to functions operating on the elements and structures of a formal
or natural language. Language-aware functions allow users to work
with meaningful units, increasing efficiency and reducing errors.
While all modern source code editors provide programmers with language-aware
functions, similar functions for natural-language editing are almost
nonexistent. Writers have to manipulate characters, which makes editing
and revising challenging and results in typical errors. We describe
the LingURed project, in which we implement language aware editing
functions for German with the goal of supporting experienced writers.
Our approach is based on the combination of standard editor functionality
and shallow localized natural language processing. Prototypical functions
demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. Based on our preliminary
experience we discuss requirements for NLP components suitable for
use in interactive editing environments.}},
citeulike-article-id = {5845566},
isbn = {978-83-60810-22-4},
keywords = {lingured, nlp, writing-tools},
location = {Mragowo, Poland},
posted-at = {2009-09-27 17:27:38},
priority = {0},
url = {http://www.proceedings2009.imcsit.org/pliks/101.pdf}
}
@misc{mahlow2009f,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{Making Word Processors Process Words}},
howpublished = {Talk at the onsite sessions (June 18 -- 21) and online discussion
forum in Sakai (February 23 -- 27) at Computers and Writing 2009},
year = {2009},
booktitle = {Computers and Writing 2009},
citeulike-article-id = {5845568},
keywords = {lingured, writing},
location = {UC Davis, CA},
posted-at = {2009-09-27 17:30:20},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2009b,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{Opportunities and Limits for Language Awareness in Text Editors}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on NLP for Reading and Writing -- Resources,
Algorithms and Tools (SLTC 2008)},
year = {2009},
editor = {Domeij, Rickard and Kokkinakis, Sofie J. and Knutsson, Ola and Sofkova
Hashemi, Sylvana},
volume = {3},
series = {NEALT Proceedings Series},
pages = {14-18},
month = feb,
publisher = {Tartu University Library (Estonia)},
abstract = {{In this paper we argue that the concept of language awareness, as
known from programmer's editors, can be transferred to writing natural
language and word processors. We propose editing functions which
use methods from computational linguistics and take the structures
of natural languages into consideration. Such functions could reduce
errors and better support writers in realizing their communicative
goals. We briefly compare characteristics of programming languages
and natural languages and their processing tools with respect to
their suitability for being used in languageaware functions in editors.
However, linguistic methods have limits, and there are various aspects
software developers have to take into account to avoid creating a
solution looking for a problem: Language-aware functions could be
powerful tools for writers, but writers must not be forced to adapt
to their tools.}},
citeulike-article-id = {4067376},
day = {17},
howpublished = {Electronically Published},
keywords = {editing, editor, lingured, nlp, word-processing, writing, writing-tools},
posted-at = {2009-02-18 13:44:30},
priority = {0},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10062/8696}
}
@article{mahlow2009c,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{SMM}: Detailed, Structured Morphological Analysis for {Spanish}},
journal = {Polibits. Computer science and computer engineering with applications},
year = {2009},
pages = {41-48},
number = {39},
abstract = {{We present a morphological analyzer for Spanish called SMM. SMM is
implemented in the grammar development framework Malaga, which is
based on the formalism of Left-Associative Grammar. We briefly present
the Malaga framework, describe the implementation decisions for some
interesting morphological phenomena of Spanish, and report on the
evaluation results from the analysis of corpora. SMM was originally
only designed for analyzing word forms; in this article we outline
two approaches for using SMM and the facilities provided by Malaga
to also generate verbal paradigms. SMM can also be embedded into
applications by making use of the Malaga programming interface; we
briefly discuss some application scenarios.}},
citeulike-article-id = {4172130},
editor = {Sidorov, Grigori},
keywords = {diss, lag, malaga, morphology, nlp, smm, spanish},
posted-at = {2009-03-13 17:25:01},
priority = {0}
}
@proceedings{mahlow2009d,
title = {{State of the Art in Computational Morphology: Workshop on Systems
and Frameworks for Computational Morphology, SFCM 2009, Zurich, Switzerland,
September 2009, Proceedings}},
year = {2009},
editor = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
volume = {41},
series = {Communications in Computer and Information Science},
publisher = {Springer},
month = sep,
abstract = {{This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Workshop on
Systems andFrameworks for Computational Morphology, SFCM 2009, held
in Z{ü}rich,Switzerland, in September 2009.The workshop had three
main goals: to stimulate discussion among reseachersand developers
and to offer an up-to-date overview of available systems forGerman
morphology which provide deep analyses and are suitable for generatingspecific
word forms; to stimulate discussion among developers of generalframeworks
that can be used to implement morphological components for severallanguages;
to discuss aspects of evaluation of morphology systems and possiblefuture
competitions or tasks, such as a new edition of the Morpholympics.}},
citeulike-article-id = {5382938},
day = {01},
howpublished = {Paperback},
isbn = {3642041302},
keywords = {german, morphology, nlp, sfcm},
posted-at = {2009-08-06 16:18:39},
priority = {0},
url = {http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/3642041302}
}
@incollection{mahlow2009g,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {A target-driven evaluation of morphological components for {German}},
booktitle = {Searching Answers -- Festschrift in Honour of Michael Hess on the
Occasion of his 60th Birthday},
publisher = {MV-Verlag},
year = {2009},
editor = {Clematide, Simon and Klenner, Manfred and Volk, Martin},
pages = {85-99},
address = {M{ü}nster},
month = oct,
abstract = {{In this paper we present an evaluation of rule-based morphological
components for German for use in an interactive editing environment.
The criteria for the evaluation are deduced from the intended use
of these components, namely availability, performance, programming
interfaces, and analysis quality. We evaluated systems developed
and maintained since decades as well as new systems. However, we
note serious general shortcomings when looking closer at recent implementations
and come to the conclusion that the oldest system is the only one
that satisfies our requirements.}},
citeulike-article-id = {6043557},
isbn = {978-3-86582-955-9},
keywords = {evaluation, german, morphology, nlp},
posted-at = {2009-10-30 15:59:18},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2010c,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
title = {{Noun Phrase Chunking and Categorization for Authoring Aids}},
booktitle = {Semantic Approaches in Natural Language Processing: Proceedings of
the Conference on Natural Language Processing 2010 (KONVENS)},
year = {2010},
editor = {Pinkal, Manfred and Rehbein, Ines and Schulte im Walde, Sabine and
Storrer, Angelika},
pages = {57-65},
address = {Saarbr{ü}cken, Germany},
publisher = {Universaar},
abstract = {{Effective authoring aids, whether for novice, second-language, or
experienced writers, require linguistic knowledge. With respect to
depth of analysis, authoring aids that aim to support revising and
editing go beyond POS-tagging but cannot work on complete, mostly
well-formed sentences to perform deep syntactic analysis, since a
text undergoing revision is in a constant state of flux. In order
to cope with incomplete and changing text, authoring aids for revising
and editing thus have to use shallow analyses, which are fast and
robust. In this paper, we discuss noun phrase chunking for German
as resource for language-aware editing functions as developed in
the LingURed project. We will identify requirements for resources
with respect to availability, interactivity, performance and quality
of results. From our experiments we also provide some information
concerning ambiguity of German noun phrases.}},
citeulike-article-id = {7812050},
isbn = {978-3-86223-004-4},
keywords = {german, nlp, noun_phrases},
location = {Saarbr{ü}cken},
posted-at = {2010-09-11 17:43:08},
priority = {0},
url = {http://universaar.uni-saarland.de/monographien/volltexte/2010/12/}
}
@book{mahlow2011b,
title = {Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology: {S}econd International
Workshop, {SFCM} 2011, Zurich, {S}witzerland, {A}ugust 26, 2011,
Proceedings},
publisher = {Springer},
year = {2011},
editor = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
volume = {100},
series = {Communications in Computer and Information Science},
month = sep,
citeulike-article-id = {9671642},
day = {09},
howpublished = {Paperback},
isbn = {3642231373},
keywords = {morphology, nlp, sfcm},
location = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
posted-at = {2011-08-15 22:04:36},
priority = {0},
url = {http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/3642231373}
}
@book{mahlow2013a,
title = {Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology: {T}hird International
Workshop, {SFCM} 2013, Berlin, {G}ermany, {S}eptember 6, 2013, Proceedings},
publisher = {Springer},
year = {2013},
editor = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael},
volume = {380},
series = {Communications in Computer and Information Science},
month = aug,
citeulike-article-id = {12599893},
day = {28},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-40486-3},
howpublished = {Paperback},
isbn = {3642231373},
keywords = {morphology, nlp, sfcm},
location = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
posted-at = {2013-08-28 13:01:10},
priority = {0},
url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40486-3}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2010b,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael and Fenske, Wolfram},
title = {{A solid foundation: Why e-assessment should be based on a systematic
typology of test items}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Learning 2010,
Freiburg, Germany, July 26 -- 29, 2010},
year = {2010},
editor = {Nunes, Miguel B. and McPherson, Maggie},
volume = {2},
pages = {47-51},
month = jul,
publisher = {IADIS Press},
abstract = {{The Bologna Process requires, besides other changes, more frequent
assessment of students, both during and after modules. As e-learning
and e-teaching scenarios already play important roles in many curricula,
instructors are now starting to consider e-assessment as well. To
enable automated evaluation, selected-response items are typically
used in e-assessment. However, current e-assessment platforms offer
only a limited and rather arbitrary selection of item types. This
means that the decision on which item types to use in a test is often
based on purely technical issues instead of pedagogical considerations.
In this paper, we argue that both implementers and users of e-assessment
platforms should abstract from current implementations and base the
selection of item types for e-assessment on a sound typology of test
items. This would allow instructors to choose the item types best
suited for a test and it would allow implementers to generalize the
test facilities of their systems, reducing maintenance and development
costs. As an example, we outline RuÌtter's 1973 typology and discuss
selected issues from the point of users and implementers of e-assessment.}},
citeulike-article-id = {7538536},
journal = {Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Learning 2010},
keywords = {assessment, elearning},
location = {Freiburg i. Br.},
posted-at = {2010-07-26 10:29:30},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2008b,
author = {Mahlow, Cerstin and Piotrowski, Michael and Hess, Michael},
title = {{Language-aware Text Editing}},
booktitle = {LREC 2008 Workshop on NLP Resources, Algorithms and Tools for Authoring
Aids},
year = {2008},
editor = {Dale, Robert and Max, Aur{é}lien and Zock, Michael},
pages = {9-13},
address = {Marrakech, Morocco},
organization = {ELRA},
abstract = {{While software developers have various power tools at their disposal
that make the writing of computer programs more efficient, authors
of texts do not have the support of such power tools. Text processors
still operate on the level of characters and strings rather than
on the level of word forms and grammatical constructions. This forces
authors to constantly switch between low-level, character oriented,
editing operations and high-level, conceptual, verbalisation processes.
We suggest the development of language-aware text editing tools that
simplify certain frequent, yet complex editing operations by defining
them on the level of linguistic units. Pluralizing an entire noun
phrase plus the verb forms governed by it would be an ambitious example,
swapping the elements of a conjunctive construction a more modest
one. We describe a pilot implementation for German where these operations
are seamlessly integrated with the standard functions of an existing
open-source editor. The operations can be invoked on demand and do
not intrude on the authoring process. Changes can be performed locally
or globally, thus simplifying the writing process considerably, and
making the resulting texts more consistent.}},
citeulike-article-id = {2859514},
keywords = {editing, lingured, word-processing, writing},
posted-at = {2008-06-04 22:32:09},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{piotrowski2009a,
author = {Piotrowski, Michael and Mahlow, Cerstin},
title = {{Linguistic editing support}},
booktitle = {DocEng'09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering},
year = {2009},
pages = {214-217},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
month = sep,
publisher = {ACM},
abstract = {{Unlike programmers, authors only get very little support from their
writing tools, i.e., their word processors and editors. Current editors
are unaware of the objects and structures of natural languages and
only offer character-based operations for manipulating text. Writers
thus have to execute complex sequences of low-level functions to
achieve their rhetoric or stylistic goals while composing. Software
requiring long and complex sequences of operations causes users to
make slips. In the case of editing and revising, these slips result
in typical revision errors, such as sentences without a verb, agreement
errors, or incorrect word order. In the LingURed project, we are
developing language-aware editing functions to prevent errors. These
functions operate on linguistic elements, not characters, thus shortening
the command sequences writers have to execute. This paper describes
the motivation and background of the LingURed project and shows some
prototypical language-aware functions.}},
citeulike-article-id = {5685549},
keywords = {lingured, slips, word-processing},
posted-at = {2009-08-30 13:17:13},
priority = {0}
}
@book{piotrowski2010a,
title = {{Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Linguistics
and Writing: Writing Processes and Authoring Aids}},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
year = {2010},
editor = {Piotrowski, Michael and Mahlow, Cerstin and Dale, Robert},
address = {Stroudsburg, PA},
month = jun,
citeulike-article-id = {7253739},
keywords = {clw, documents, editing, editor, nlp, research-on-writing, word-processing,
writing, writing-process, writing-tools},
location = {Los Angeles, CA},
posted-at = {2010-06-04 19:36:06},
priority = {0},
url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W10/W10-04}
}
@book{clw2012,
title = {{Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics
and Writing (CL&W 2012): Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Document
Creation and Document Engineering}},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
year = {2012},
editor = {Piotrowski, Michael and Mahlow, Cerstin and Dale, Robert},
address = {Stroudsburg, PA, USA},
month = apr,
citeulike-article-id = {10610141},
keywords = {clw},
location = {Avignon, France},
posted-at = {2012-04-26 11:14:16},
priority = {0},
url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W12/#0300}
}
@incollection{mahlow2012c,
author = {Schreiber, David and Mahlow, Cerstin and Juska-Bacher, Britta},
title = {{Phraseologische Neologismen: Identifikation und Validierung}},
booktitle = {Yearbook of Phraseology 2012},
publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton},
year = {2012},
editor = {Kuiper, Koenraad},
volume = {3},
pages = {3-30},
address = {Berlin, Boston},
citeulike-article-id = {11823364},
issn = {1868-632X},
keywords = {corpus, german, nlp, oldphras, phrasemes},
posted-at = {2012-12-03 16:49:00},
priority = {0}
}
@InProceedings{mahlow2006,
author = {Zimmermann, Tobias and Mahlow, Cerstin and Grund, Sven},
title = {{Vielfalt und Vernetzung - zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren zur F{ö}rderung
von E-Learning an einer geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakult{ä}t}},
booktitle = {E-Learning - alltagstaugliche Innovation?},
year = {2006},
editor = {Seiler Schiedt, Eva and K{ä}lin, Siglinde and Sengstag, Christian},
series = {Medien in der Wissenschaft},
pages = {404},
address = {M{ü}nster},
publisher = {Waxmann Verlag},
citeulike-article-id = {2635000},
journal = {E-Learning - alltagstaugliche Innovation?},
keywords = {elearning},
posted-at = {2008-04-06 17:30:40},
priority = {0}
}